Genetically organism Essay

Everyone in the creation competes in his/her way to sustain standards through which he/she can feed themselves and their loved ones with viands. It is the basic fate every human being requires daily from birth until death. Today in the modern days different forms of many foods have evolved ranging from organic foods to contractableally circumscribed foods. Since the genetically special foods have taken everywhere the commercialize they be known to be greater in resistance to pesticides and viruses, gene set higher nutritional value and have a longer exhalation date. Lastly, these foods atomic number 18 sold at cheaper prices in comparison to the organic foods.However, the electric potential risks of these foods ar still being debated all over the world. The three reasons wherefore the genetically engineered food should be labeled separately are the health hazards, religious ethical concerns, and economic concerns refer. The reason wherefore genetically limited foo ds should be labeled separately from organic foods are the health hazards problematical in the production. The major health hazard knotted in the non-labeling of genetic foods is that people all over the world have allergies to particular types of ingredients employ in the manufacturing of the foods.The genetically circumscribed foods include soybean, maize, chicory, potato, squash, oilseed rape (canola), pineapples, and strawberries. 1 genetically modified foods can seduce health diseases such as cancers, a newly discovered disease Morgellons, and other allergies. Without any specific labeling, the rate at which these diseases can occur doubles because people allergic to indisputable genes used in these foods, and on that point is no other way to determines these foods consist these genes or not. A recent article published in shaft examined the effects of GM potatoes on the digestive tract in rats.This bailiwick claimed that there were appreciable differences in the inte stines of rats fed GM potatoes and rats fed unrestricted potatoes. Many children in the US and Europe have developed weighty allergies to peanuts and other foods. There is a possibility that introducing a gene into a plant may make a new allergen or cause an allergic reaction in susceptible individuals. (Raab, Grobe 2009) 2 The quoted article above examines the differences amongst the Rats that fed on organic produce of potatoes and the ones that fed on the GM potatoes.The rats that fed on GM foods developed precancerous cell growing in their digestive tracts, inhibited developments of their brains, livers, and testicles. They also faced enlarged pancreas and intestines, and suffered insubordinate system damage. The quote also demonstrates the possibility of the harmful side effects that GM foods can cause to future human generations. The possible resolving to minimize these side effects is that Extensive testing of GM foods should be required to avoid the possibility of harm to consumers with food allergies. Labeling of GM foods and food products result acquire new importance.Before buying a legitimate GM product, people exit be able to determine if they are allergic to its ingredients or not. Another reason why genetically modified foods should be labeled separately from organic foods is the religious ethical concerns involved in the production. Different religious groups prohibit themselves from eating certain types of sentient being products. For example, Muslims do not eat any type of enzymes extracted from Pork. 3 Thus, using genes to create traces of genetic material from pork in GM foods and plants without labeling them could cause a stir in the Muslim sect.Another ethical concern is that puppet rights can harmfully be impact by excessive manufacturing of inherited Foods. For example, Sheep given more powerful hormones could suffer problems relating to growth and problems in digestive systems. Without specific labeling on foods, animals being tested cannot be identified, and this could lead to and malpractices by large corporations. Ethical and religious concerns include the belief that the engineering involved is unnatural, and preoccupations regarding the consumption of religiously forbidden ingredients from certain animals.These new technologies, it is argued, bring out religious freedom by placing a burden on those who dramatise strict religious dietary laws. The government is not primitively obligate to make accommodations in favor of religious groups that are incidentally affected by neutral rules. Accordingly, the neutral decision of not labeling genetically modified foods met this constitutional standard and was not subjected to a more rigorous constitutional adjudication test. (Lietz, 2000) 4.The quoted excerpt above from the Harvard law review emphasizes the importance of the labeling on genetically modified foods because without explanation of how these foods are manufactured, it is unethical and un favorable to religious and heathen groups that restrict themselves from practices in consumption of certain ingredients included in these foods. In other words, the use of these technologies is harming the religion freedom of people. 4 The government of United States protects the non-labeling by not passing laws that require rigorous tests on GM foods because it is believed that there are already laws that protect religious groups.The third reason why genetically modified foods should be labeled separately is the economic concerns involved in the production. The main economic concern is that the world food trade could be monopolized by large multinational corporations that control the production and dispersal of genetically manufactured seeds. If this happens, they would be able manipulate governments to pass laws that enduret require companies to label their GM foods. 5 Monopolization allow for gain prices of seeds and eliminate small level farming. GMOs are the products of l arge corporations and considered intellectual property.Thus, they are protected by patents and copyrights. This means that if farmers want to use genetically modified crops, they must buy it from a corporation. If the world relies solely on GMOs, this means that these corporations will control the worlds food supply, leading to the monopolisation of food. The use of GMOs is driving out the need for small farmers. These small farmers are forced to switch to GMOs in order to compete with other GMO farmers, only in the process, they are subjugated to the control of the corporation that produced the GMOs.(Barton, 2002) 6 The above departure was taken from a research about non labeling consequences published in the Harvard virtue Review that extrapolates the consequences if the food industry is monopolized. It explains that if this happens, the patents and copyrights will increase prices of foods massively and eradicate the system of low scale farming. Each and every farmer will ne ed to rely on large corporations to grow crops, and GM foods will be seasonal that means in every season the seeds will expire and costs of storage and harvesting will sky rocket. every last(predicate) in all, the corporations will completely take over the food sourcing cheapjack people in what they produce for the sole purpose of profits. Thus, it will be considered legal and ethical. Regulations should be passed by governments all around the world that purely insist on the labeling of genetically manufactured foods. Without labeling on the genetically modify Foods the health hazards, religious ethical concerns, and economical concerns will increase over time. Therefore, instead of looking at the future from the eyes of the economic benefit, the world should look at the consequences this evolution could lead.Works Cited Page 1. Genetically special Food. Crowdsourcing Questions & Answers. N. p. , n. d. Web. 18 may 2011. 2. 6Barton. GMF Labeling Issues. Harvard Law Review, Wi nter 2002. Web. 18 May 2011. . 3. Daneil, Genetically Modified Foods erupt Health Channel. Home Better Health Channel. Deakin University. Web. 18 May 2011. .4. 2Grobe, and Raab. Genetically Modified Foods Better Health Channel. Home Better Health Channel. Deakin University. Web. 18 May 2011. . 5. 4 Lietz, supra note 11, at 416 Julie Teel, regularisation Genetically Modified Products and Processes An Overview of Approaches, 8 N. Y. U. ENVTL. L. J. 649, 660-61 (2000) 6. Genetically Modified Food. Crowdsourcing Questions & Answers. N. p. , n. d. Web. 18 May 2011. .