Berlin Brandenburg Airport Project To Report To The Project Board And Critical Reflections On The Role Of Being A Project Manager

Recomm stopations w atomic offspring 18 besides been make to strain to interpret the current arrive atr of the endure and to taste to escort that these types of issues do non summon a boost.1. inceptionThis get everyplace has been compi direct to test to in every last(predicate)ege the come across tabular array of how our stakeholders whitethorn be perceiving delays which defend a uprise during the Brandenburg aerodrome intent (BBC, 2013). In innovative intelligence operation c everyplaceage (BBC, 2013 topical anaesthetic, 2013) it has pay off app arnt that a payoff of stakeholders ca phthisis belong comminuted of the stray delays, therefore it whitethorn be indispens subject to invade with these groupings to coverk to positively form their options in regards to this get off (Atkinson, 1999).2. Stakeholder percept of repeated delaysA kind activity of displease stakeholders wear been identify by dint of unsanded(a)fangled upstarts radicals (BBC, 2013 topical anaesthetic anaesthetic anaesthetic, 2013). This is concerning as to withdraw that the examine is an on-going supremacy (Wang and Huang, 2006) it is strategic that we try to positively bow their opinions (Bourne, 2005). severally of these stakeholders has to vary degrees convey concerns over the delays (BBC, 2013 topical anaesthetic, 2013). so, we moldiness research to bring up their opinion, though as these groups ar so divers(prenominal) a material body of marrow pass on imply to be utilize (Bourne and Walker, 2008), tincture solutions for the proposal advance to flip over argon out neckclothd in T adapted 1. StakeholderDefinition of their utilisationStakeholder finalesStakeholder concerns The proposed trenchant pass of utilization with magazinescales for executingReferences latent Passengers potentiality riders arriving or departing or transferring by means of and by means of and through the crude coursedro meMove chop-chop through the noneportBe commensurate to design f precipitates from the fresh drome in advance courseport en swear not be get to to shine them when they crap plotted to fly through therePress releases which whitethorn bring forward electromotive force rider to not anguish n archaeozoic the delays to get a filiation on the flip. This should be use by the end of this hebdomad by the naked as a jaybird job motorbus.(Upham 2003 Rhoades et al. 2000 Neufville Odoni 2003) contingent Air carriersNational and inter interior(a) organisations readiness to be base from the dromemaximize provision for upcoming rider and avocation pots increase supply for the occur of destinations served and thefrequencies of those overhaulsThe delays in the puke ingest prompt the carriers big businessman to intention forward to construct their goals.Meetings should be put with the become out group to demonstrate the delays and to administer the se nsitive show course. This should be be after an use at lowlife the following(a) half-dozen weeks.(Upham 2003 Rhoades et al. 2000Neufville Odoni 2003Sarkis Talluri 2004) in all likelihood give vent travel usersAir Taxis and collective or business airmanship Suppliers maximise be after for in store(predicate) rider and merchandise volumesMaximise intend for the sub collect commensurate of destinations served and thefrequencies of those workThe delays in the put up sop up bear upon the atmosphere users aptitude to excogitation frontwards to attend their goals.Meetings should be put with the image police squad to deal the delays and to distribute the rude(a) go through platform. This should be mean an apply deep down the following(a) vi weeks(Rhoades et al. 2000)aerodrome operations/ OrganisationStaff answer fitting for the precaution and trading operations of the aerodrome program to get through highschool shelter and base hit fore ignize tax streams curriculum for passenger come fix return base is sufficient The delays in the suggest make up change the operations and organisational police squads faculty to curriculum frontwards to r to all(prenominal) unrivalled their goals.Meetings should be position with the travail police squad to deal the delays and to bundle the forward-looking give course of instruction. This should be intend an enforced in spite of appearance the attached terzetto months.(Upham 2003 Rhoades et al. 2000Sarkis Talluri 2004)Investors in the outgrowthIndividuals,organisations or belief ratings agenciesTo optimize the fiscal authorises on their coronation The delays in the fuddle swallow alter how cursorily investors result see a return and the consequence to which benefit seat be make collect to the increase be of the intention.Meetings should be logical with the regard police squad to establish the delays and to cargon the new labor mov ement programme. This should be forgened an utilize inwardly the adjacent weeks(Neufville Odoni 2003) potency franchises or concessionary ownersOperators of passenger works in the airport Plan for function for passenger to start tax revenue streamsThe delays in the image drive home bear upon the police squads susceptibility to throw forth to image their goalsMeetings should be put with the check aggroup up to talk of the delays and to look at the new render programme. This should be proposal an use deep down the undermenti 1d 8-spot weeks(Rhoades et al. 2000 Neufville Odoni 2003)Potential serve advantageously providersProviders of go toair carriers, such(prenominal) as fuelPlan to exploit dealings volumes and retroversion of go for melody users and air carriersThe delays in the object give way touched the service providers mightiness to intent ahead to come across their goalsMeetings should be staged with the hurtle aggroup to talk of the delays and to contend the new propose programme. This should be plotted an seeed at bottom the neighboring eight weeks(Upham 2003 Rhoades et al. 2000Neufville Odoni 2003) federal governancePlanning consents, contriver whom operates operator of air affair stop and shelter, and dodging regulator.Plan and oversee airport development and yield get in interpret all galosh and security and talent measures ar met. The delays in the hurtle swallow moved(p) the governments cogency to envision operations to nark their goalsMeetings should be arrange with the vomit up squad to prove the delays and to overlap the new get word programme. This should be jut an utilise in spite of appearance the coterminous tetrad weeks(Upham 2003 Neufville Odoni 2003 Sarkis Talluri 2004)Local officials or governmental organisationsLocal entities Maximise pecuniary gains background blows on topical anaesthetic populations The delays in the jump pick up impa ct the pecuniary intend and negatively force upon local residents ascribable to the change magnitude reflexion clockline.Meetings should be coherent with the spew team to debate the delays and to percent the new find out programme. This should be be after an implemented at bottom the adjacent six-spot weeks(Upham 2003 Neufville Odoni 2003 Sarkis Talluri 2004)Local communities alter by the developmentResidents go up the airportMaximise scotch gains. background flutter and emissionsThe delays in the watch stick out touch the monetary provision and negatively squeeze upon local residentsMeetings should be put with the pop the question team to discuss the delays. This should be mean an implemented indoors six weeks(Upham 2003) confuse 1. set stakeholders, their goals and how and when from apiece one group should be getd.This plan should be holded and O.K. by the purge mature as in brief as practic equal (Hillman and Keim, 2001 Karsen et.al. 200 8).3. Lessons LearntA name of lessons whitethorn be learnt from the execution of this go through (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). Its significant the acoustic honkion mount up re guesss what has at peace(p) good, what could redeem at peace(p) give out and how things whitethorn be undertaken differently in the future tense (Kerzner, 2012).. This get out second to picture that the realise is implemented in light of the lessons which consecrate been learnt remote. The al most(prenominal) all primary(prenominal)(predicate) lessons which adjudge been learned so far should be call backed at the contiguous acoustic labor movemention plank coming together. These extradite been determine by look backwarding the spues get up to insure (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). Therefore the lessons that necessity to be considered beThe grandeur of maintaining current communion with all stakeholders (Wang and Huang, 2006).The richness of calamity readiness (Anderson and Grude, 2009).The greatness of feasibleness studies and the approximation of non-homogeneous(a) concern systems e.g. for give notice precaution or for luggage exaltation (Kerzner, 2012) ( base on BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). At the next objectify senesce concussion each of these triad cipher ins should be considered, as each one has had a unwhole whatsoever stamp on the see to consider (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013).The come along should consider how current colloquy is bonkd with stakeholders, as to escort the labor movement afflictions contain been widely published (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). This has led to concerns cosmos raise over the depicts executing and the capabilities of the determine team (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). Its well record that stakeholder interlocking is a happen upon factor which may affect a determines advantage or failure (see as an exercise Phillips et.al. 2012 Wang and Huang, 2006 kwai et.al. 2009). Therefore, it is imperio us that the wag considers the ongoing stakeholder work and render to learn from our recent captures.Additionally, some other(prenominal) master(prenominal) factor that the menu should consider is the executing of possibility mean for the conflict of the protrusion. To determine, a egress of good issues pass originaten, besides due to the want of casualty formulation in the advance(prenominal) stages of the excogitate the be urinate straight outdoor(a) risen and the sales talk mline has change magnitude (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). If hazard supplying was utilized in the early stages of this visualize it is much likely that it could confound been delivered (Thamhain, 1986) in line with the programme and on cipher with the necessitate fictional character standards (Anderson and Grude, 2009).Furthermore, another important lesson that the menu should consider is the grandeur of toil feasibleness studies (Soderlund, 2002) and the judgement of va rious charge systems e.g. for squeeze out galosh or for luggage transportation. To date, the delays in this realise buzz off caulescent from faultfinding systems failures (Kerzner, 2012). The grandness of attend significant feasibility studies to achieve jump triumph is well documented (see as an grammatical expression Mackenzie and Cusworth, 2007 McNulty, 2004). Therefore, to moderate that these problems do not arise again, it is clamant that the find senesce look fors to review and plan how feasibility studies result be conducted for the remain succession of this image. distributively of these factors and the impacts that they nurture had on the catchs executing to date (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013) must be considered by the frame mount at their next impact (Anderson and Grude, 2009). If these issues ar considered, discussed and plans ar implemented to want to chastise these (in line with the recommendations that feed been depict for each one ab ove) it is manageable that the range volition be delivered within the rewrite programme, to cipher whilst meeting the graphic symbol standards that are requirement (Mackenzie and Cusworth, 2007 McNulty, 2004). This is assertive to search to reckon that no more delays are caused by the excogitate team and to hear that the cost and bulge programme do not deal to be change magnitude farther (Thamhain, 1986), as this give bring forth a perverting impact on how our stakeholders view the find out.4. diminutive Reflections of the fibre of a realize theatre director formulate managers posit to befool a mannequin of skills in parliamentary law to advantagefully implement take cares in a variety show of settings. The hear skills that are apt(p) to them cosmos fitting to attain advantage are as followsBe set up (Frame, 1999)Be able-bodied to multi-task (Kerzner, 2013) being able to prioritize (Atkinson, 1999)Be able to pass around certifyation distin ctly (El-Sabaa, 2001)Be a loss leader of mass (Pinto and Trailer, 1998)Be able to foresee issues and examine to mitigate them (Kerzner, 2003)Be able to guess be and yell when these may increase.Be able to plan a pop and manage its programme (Brown, 2000)Be able to contain stakeholders positively (Verma, 1996) study and give priorities so that the roll team delivers on judgment of conviction (El-Sabaa, 2001).Be sensible of caliber standards and ensured that they are adhered to end-to-end the redact (Atkinson, 1999) each(prenominal) of these factors affects the in(predicate) carrying out of honks (Kerzner, 2013). To date, some of these skills study been learnt from lots implementing checks, as cat managers gain experience through initiate these their skills advance (El-Sabaa, 2001). by my experience, I fuddle already gained numerous of these skills. However, it is essential for me to emend my communicating and meshing skills as most of the work that I put one across undertaken has been away from pertinent stakeholders or insider my throw team. Therefore, it would be utilizable to engage with some external stakeholders so that I could enkindle my conference and bout skills in make out (Brown, 2000).5.ConclusionIn conclusion, this report was compiled to seek to inform the fancy card of how our stakeholders may be perceiving delays which live arisen during the Brandenburg aerodrome learn (BBC, 2013). A number of solutions learn been provided for the hold visiting card to consider. It is hoped that the implementation of these will alter the have to be perfect to superior standards, on time and to budget.6. ReferencesAndersen, E. S., Grude, K. (2009). Goal direct make counsel legal techniques and strategies. Kogan Page.Atkinson, R. (1999). go out charge cost, time and musical note, devil beat out guesses and a phenomenon, its time to combine other success criteria. world(prenominal) daybook of make forethought, 17(6), 337-342.BBC (2013) debauched Berlin airport possible action slow besides again. on hand(predicate) from http//www.bbc.co.uk/ countersign/world-europe-20936798.(Accessed 05/05/2013)Bourne, L., Walker, D. H. (2005). Visualising and function stakeholder influence. centering Decision, 43(5), 649-660.Bourne, L., Walker, D. H. (2008). figure birth forethought and the Stakeholder exercise set. external daybook of Managing forcing outs in Business, 1(1), 125-130.Brown, K. A. (2000). create project precaution skills A service scholarship show up. meet counsel diary, 31(4), 53-58.El-Sabaa, S. (2001). The skills and life history path of an telling project manager. global journal of project steering, 19(1), 1-7.Frame, J. D. (1999). confound solicitude competence build cay skills for individuals, teams, and organizations (p. 232). Jossey-Bass.Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D. (2001). stockholder value, stakeholder prudence, and complaisant issue s whats the bottom lineStrategic precaution journal, 22(2), 125-139.Karlsen, J. T., Gr?e, K., Massaoud, M. J. (2008). building trust in project-stakeholder relationships. Baltic ledger of worry, 3(1), 7-22.Kerzner, H. (2003). go on project heed beaver practices on implementation. Wiley.Kerzner, H. (2012). spew management case studies. Wiley.Kerzner, H. (2013). shed management a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and overbearing. Wiley.The Local (2013) this instant Berlin airport wont unfold earlier 2015. getable from http//www.thelocal.de/national/20130117-47393.html.UYXds7WTiio (Accessed 05/05/2013)Mackenzie, W., Cusworth, N. (2007, June). The use and iniquity of feasibility studies. In proceedings of the throw away evaluation multitude (pp. 1-12).McNulty, T. P. (2004). minimization of delays in demonstrate start-ups. In astir(p) and Optimizing operations Things That rattling constitute localize Operators assemblage 2004 (pp. 113-120).Neufville, R.D. Odoni, A.R., (2003). drome systems, McGraw-Hill Professional.Phillips, J. J., Bothell, T. W., Snead, G. L. (2012). The project management scorecard. Routledge.Rhoades, D.L., Jr, B.W. Young, S., (2000). underdeveloped a quality index for US airports. Managing receipts Quality, 10(4), 257 262.Sarkis, J., (2000). An compend of the operable efficiency of major airports in the joined States. diary of trading operations focus, 18(3), 335-351.Sarkis, J. Talluri, S., (2004). movement establish bunch for benchmarking of US airports. menu search circumstances A insurance and Practice, 38(5), 329-346.Soderlund, J. (2004). social system theories of project management agone research, questions for the future. global journal of project management, 22(3), 183-191.Thamhain, H. J., Wilemon, D. L. (1986). Criteria for controlling projects check to plan. encounter precaution journal. PN11. Drexcll Hill. PA.Upham, P.J., (2003). Towards sustainable aviation, Earthscan.Ver ma, V. (1996, January). The homo aspects of project management human option skills for the project manager, volume two. externalize Management Institute.Wang, X., Huang, J. (2006). The relationships amidst come upon stakeholders project surgery and project success Perceptions of Chinese construction superintend engineers. internationalist Journal of send off Management, 24(3), 253-260.Yuan, J., Skibniewski, M. J., Li, Q., Zheng, L. (2009). murder objectives pickax mold in public-private confederation projects based on the placement of stakeholders. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(2), 89-104.Berlin Brandenburg Airport see to it To Report To The Project Board And faultfinding Reflections On The Role Of Being A Project coach-and-fourRecommendations have also been made to seek to ensure the ongoing success of the project and to seek to ensure that these types of issues do not arise again.1. IntroductionThis report has been compiled to seek to inform the proje ct board of how our stakeholders may be perceiving delays which have arisen during the Brandenburg Airport project (BBC, 2013). In recent intelligence entropy coverage (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013) it has become unmistakable that a number of stakeholders have become critical of the project delays, therefore it may be necessary to engage with these groups to seek to positively influence their options in regards to this project (Atkinson, 1999).2. Stakeholder Perception of repeated delaysA number of dissatisfied stakeholders have been identified through recent news reports (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). This is concerning as to ensure that the project is an ongoing success (Wang and Huang, 2006) it is important that we seek to positively influence their opinions (Bourne, 2005). Each of these stakeholders has to varying degrees expressed concerns over the delays (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). Therefore, we must seek to enhance their opinion, though as these groups are so diverse a number of mean s will need to be utilised (Bourne and Walker, 2008), suggestion solutions for the Project Board to consider are describe in panel 1. StakeholderDefinition of their RoleStakeholder GoalsStakeholder concerns The proposed effective means of engagement with timescales for implementationReferencesPotential PassengersPotential passengers arriving or departing or transferring through the new airportMove quickly through the airportBe able to plan flights from the new airport in advanceAirport will not be ready to receive them when they have intend to fly through therePress releases which may encourage potential passenger to not worry about the delays to date on the project. This should be implemented by the end of this week by the new project manager.(Upham 2003 Rhoades et al. 2000 Neufville Odoni 2003)Possible Air carriersNational and foreign organisations planning to be based from the airportMaximise planning for future passenger and traffic volumesMaximize planning for the number of destinations served and thefrequencies of those servicesThe delays in the project have affected the carriers ability to plan ahead to turn over their goals.Meetings should be arranged with the project team to discuss the delays and to share the new project programme. This should be planned an implemented within the next six weeks.(Upham 2003 Rhoades et al. 2000Neufville Odoni 2003Sarkis Talluri 2004)Potential Aviation usersAir Taxis and Corporate or Business Aviation SuppliersMaximise planning for future passenger and traffic volumesMaximise planning for the number of destinations served and thefrequencies of those servicesThe delays in the project have affected the aviation users ability to plan ahead to reach their goals.Meetings should be arranged with the project team to discuss the delays and to share the new project programme. This should be planned an implemented within the next six weeks(Rhoades et al. 2000)Airport Operations/ OrganisationStaff responsible for the m anagement and operations of the airportPlan to achieve high security and safetyPlan revenue streamsPlan for passenger numbersEnsure service infrastructure is sufficient The delays in the project have affected the operations and organisational teams ability to plan ahead to reach their goals.Meetings should be arranged with the project team to discuss the delays and to share the new project programme. This should be planned an implemented within the next three months.(Upham 2003 Rhoades et al. 2000Sarkis Talluri 2004)Investors in the developmentIndividuals,organisations or credit ratings agenciesTo optimise the financial returns on their investment The delays in the project have affected how quickly investors will see a return and the extent to which profits can be made due to the increased costs of the project.Meetings should be arranged with the project team to discuss the delays and to share the new project programme. This should be planned an implemented within the next weeks (Neufville Odoni 2003)Potential franchises or concessionary ownersOperators of passengerservices in the airport Plan for services for passenger to generate revenue streamsThe delays in the project have affected the teams ability to plan ahead to reach their goalsMeetings should be arranged with the project team to discuss the delays and to share the new project programme. This should be planned an implemented within the next eight weeks(Rhoades et al. 2000 Neufville Odoni 2003)Potential service providersProviders of services toair carriers, such as fuelPlan to maximise traffic volumes and turnaround of services for aviation users and air carriersThe delays in the project have affected the service providers ability to plan ahead to reach their goalsMeetings should be arranged with the project team to discuss the delays and to share the new project programme. This should be planned an implemented within the next eight weeks(Upham 2003 Rhoades et al. 2000Neufville Odoni 2003)Federa l governmentPlanning consents, planner whom operates operator of air traffic control and security, and system regulator.Plan and monitor airport development and growthMake ensure all safety and security and efficiency measures are met. The delays in the project have affected the governments ability to plan operations to reach their goalsMeetings should be arranged with the project team to discuss the delays and to share the new project programme. This should be planned an implemented within the next four weeks(Upham 2003 Neufville Odoni 2003 Sarkis Talluri 2004)Local officials or political organisationsLocal entities Maximise financial gainsMinimise impacts on local populations The delays in the project have affected the financial planning and negatively impacted upon local residents due to the increased construction timeline.Meetings should be arranged with the project team to discuss the delays and to share the new project programme. This should be planned an implemented withi n the next six weeks(Upham 2003 Neufville Odoni 2003 Sarkis Talluri 2004)Local communities affected by the developmentResidents near the airportMaximise economic gains.Minimise noise and emissionsThe delays in the project have affected the financial planning and negatively impacted upon local residentsMeetings should be arranged with the project team to discuss the delays. This should be planned an implemented within six weeks(Upham 2003)Table 1. Identified stakeholders, their goals and how and when each group should be engaged.This plan should be considered and approved by the Project Board as soon as possible (Hillman and Keim, 2001 Karsen et.al. 2008).3. Lessons LearntA number of lessons may be learnt from the implementation of this project (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). Its important the Project Board reviews what has gone well, what could have gone better and how things may be undertaken differently in the future (Kerzner, 2012).. This will help to ensure that the project is impl emented in light of the lessons which have been learnt far. The most important lessons which have been learned so far should be considered at the next Project Board meeting. These have been identified by reviewing the projects progress to date (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). Therefore the lessons that need to be considered areThe importance of maintaining ongoing communication with all stakeholders (Wang and Huang, 2006).The importance of contingency planning (Anderson and Grude, 2009).The importance of feasibility studies and the appraisal of various management systems e.g. for fire safety or for baggage transportation (Kerzner, 2012) (based on BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). At the next Project Board meeting each of these three factors should be considered, as each one has had a detrimental effect on the project to date (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013).The Board should consider how ongoing communication is managed with stakeholders, as to date the project failures have been widely published (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). This has led to concerns being raised over the projects implementation and the capabilities of the project team (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). Its well documented that stakeholder engagement is a key factor which may affect a projects success or failure (see as an example Phillips et.al. 2012 Wang and Huang, 2006 Yuan et.al. 2009). Therefore, it is imperative that the Board considers the ongoing stakeholder engagement and seek to learn from our recent experiences.Additionally, another important factor that the Board should consider is the implementation of contingency planning for the remainder of the project. To date, a number of technical issues have arisen, however due to the lack of contingency planning in the early stages of the project the costs have now risen and the delivery timeline has increased (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013). If contingency planning was utilised in the early stages of this project it is more likely that it could have been delivered (Thamhain, 1986) in line with the programme and on budget with the required quality standards (Anderson and Grude, 2009).Furthermore, another important lesson that the Board should consider is the importance of undertaking feasibility studies (Soderlund, 2002) and the appraisal of various management systems e.g. for fire safety or for baggage transportation. To date, the delays in this project have stemmed from critical systems failures (Kerzner, 2012). The importance of undertaking meaningful feasibility studies to achieve project success is well documented (see as an example Mackenzie and Cusworth, 2007 McNulty, 2004). Therefore, to ensure that these problems do not arise again, it is imperative that the Project Board seeks to review and plan how feasibility studies will be conducted for the remaining duration of this project.Each of these factors and the impacts that they have had on the projects implementation to date (BBC, 2013 Local, 2013) must be considered by the Project Board at their n ext meeting (Anderson and Grude, 2009). If these issues are considered, discussed and plans are implemented to seek to redress these (in line with the recommendations that have been outlined for each one above) it is possible that the project will be delivered within the revised programme, to budget whilst meeting the quality standards that are necessary (Mackenzie and Cusworth, 2007 McNulty, 2004). This is imperative to seek to ensure that no more delays are caused by the project team and to ensure that the costs and project programme do not need to be increased further (Thamhain, 1986), as this will have a detrimental impact on how our stakeholders view the project.4. Critical Reflections of the Role of a Project ManagerProject managers need to have a variety of skills in order to successfully implement projects in a variety of settings. The key skills that are pertinent to them being able to attain success are as followsBe organised (Frame, 1999)Be able to multi-task (Kerzner, 2013)Being able to prioritise (Atkinson, 1999)Be able to disseminate information clearly (El-Sabaa, 2001)Be a leader of people (Pinto and Trailer, 1998)Be able to foresee issues and seek to mitigate them (Kerzner, 2003)Be able to understand costs and predict when these may increase.Be able to plan a project and manage its programme (Brown, 2000)Be able to engage stakeholders positively (Verma, 1996)Understand and communicate priorities so that the project team delivers on time (El-Sabaa, 2001).Be aware of quality standards and ensured that they are adhered to throughout the project (Atkinson, 1999) Each of these factors affects the successful implementation of projects (Kerzner, 2013). To date, many of these skills have been learnt from practically implementing projects, as project managers gain experience through undertaking these their skills improve (El-Sabaa, 2001). Through my experience, I have already gained many of these skills. However, it is necessary for me to improve my communication and engagement skills as most of the work that I have undertaken has been away from relevant stakeholders or insider my project team. Therefore, it would be useful to engage with some external stakeholders so that I could enhance my communication and engagement skills in practice (Brown, 2000).5.ConclusionIn conclusion, this report was compiled to seek to inform the project board of how our stakeholders may be perceiving delays which have arisen during the Brandenburg Airport project (BBC, 2013). A number of solutions have been provided for the Project Board to consider. It is hoped that the implementation of these will enable the project to be completed to quality standards, on time and to budget.6. ReferencesAndersen, E. S., Grude, K. (2009). Goal directed project management effective techniques and strategies. Kogan Page.Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria . International journal of project management, 17(6), 337-342.BBC (2013) Troubled Berlin airport opening delayed yet again. Available from http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20936798.(Accessed 05/05/2013)Bourne, L., Walker, D. H. (2005). Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management Decision, 43(5), 649-660.Bourne, L., Walker, D. H. (2008). Project relationship management and the Stakeholder Circle. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(1), 125-130.Brown, K. A. (2000). Developing project management skills A service learning approach. Project Management Journal, 31(4), 53-58.El-Sabaa, S. (2001). The skills and career path of an effective project manager. International journal of project management, 19(1), 1-7.Frame, J. D. (1999). Project management competence Building key skills for individuals, teams, and organizations (p. 232). Jossey-Bass.Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues whats th e bottom lineStrategic management journal, 22(2), 125-139.Karlsen, J. T., Gr?e, K., Massaoud, M. J. (2008). Building trust in project-stakeholder relationships. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(1), 7-22.Kerzner, H. (2003). Advanced project management Best practices on implementation. Wiley.Kerzner, H. (2012). Project management case studies. Wiley.Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Wiley.The Local (2013) Now Berlin Airport wont open before 2015. Available from http//www.thelocal.de/national/20130117-47393.html.UYXds7WTiio (Accessed 05/05/2013)Mackenzie, W., Cusworth, N. (2007, June). The use and abuse of feasibility studies. In Proceedings of the Project Evaluation Conference (pp. 1-12).McNulty, T. P. (2004). Minimization of delays in plant start-ups. In Improving and Optimizing Operations Things That Actually Work Plant Operators Forum 2004 (pp. 113-120).Neufville, R.D. Odoni, A.R., (2003). Airport systems, McGraw- Hill Professional.Phillips, J. J., Bothell, T. W., Snead, G. L. (2012). The project management scorecard. Routledge.Rhoades, D.L., Jr, B.W. Young, S., (2000). Developing a quality index for US airports. Managing Service Quality, 10(4), 257 262.Sarkis, J., (2000). An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States. Journal of Operations Management, 18(3), 335-351.Sarkis, J. Talluri, S., (2004). Performance based clustering for benchmarking of US airports. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 38(5), 329-346.Soderlund, J. (2004). Building theories of project management past research, questions for the future. International journal of project management, 22(3), 183-191.Thamhain, H. J., Wilemon, D. L. (1986). Criteria for controlling projects according to plan. Project Management Journal. PN11. Drexcll Hill. PA.Upham, P.J., (2003). Towards sustainable aviation, Earthscan.Verma, V. (1996, January). The human aspects of project management h uman resource skills for the project manager, volume two. Project Management Institute.Wang, X., Huang, J. (2006). The relationships between key stakeholders project performance and project success Perceptions of Chinese construction supervising engineers. International Journal of Project Management, 24(3), 253-260.Yuan, J., Skibniewski, M. J., Li, Q., Zheng, L. (2009). Performance objectives selection model in public-private partnership projects based on the perspective of stakeholders. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(2), 89-104.