Social And Natural Sciences Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Social And subjective Sciences - Essay ExampleA great contribution of limpid positivism into philosophical and methodological explorative methods is considered pull ahead on the example of mixer and natural sciences. In sociology, positivism is the core pictureatic methodology. Science and head be two basic pillars of positivism. Still, it is very important to solve the major problem of social sciences, which concerns results finding on the basis of complex species research and study. The roots of Positivism smoke be traced in the french Enlightenment. The philosopher suggested combining natural sciences principles with social sciences. Comte claimed that religion was conquered by science. It was much important those times to refer to facts and laws, than to suppositions and considerations. scientific knowledge is outlined by Comte in the following way the stage of fictitious, metaphysical and scientific knowledge. The resist stage of knowledge, scientific knowledge, is preferential for Comte. The development of tout ensemble other stages, if successfully implemented, would result in scientific knowledge emergence. These stages of knowledge can be too sought in Empiricism. This science is based on observable facts, claiming that logical and mathematical roots are in the background of the facts. The main principle of positivism should be also found in positive information, which can be obtained from a positive experience. A methodological paradigm of positivism consists of science and inquiry. An empirical exploration is of crucial importance for any science.... These stages of knowledge can be also sought in Empiricism. This science is based on observable facts, claiming that logical and mathematical roots are on the background of the facts. The main principle of positivism should be also found in positive information, which can be obtained from a positive experience. Therefore, a methodological paradigm of positivism consists of science and inqu iry. An empirical exploration is of crucial importance for any science. Thus, from positivist perspective it can be claimed that social phenomena are not distributed in accordance with certain or specific types, where the members of these types are homogenous (Cassell, 2002). In other words, positivist vision or methodology implemented in social sciences is not relevant to the fullest extent. Sociological phenomena are of inhomogeneous nature. For example, a structure of any sociological endeavor or phenomena cannot be considered in accordance with specific features or characteristics, which are relevant at all times. Moreover, social processes and generalizations cannot be characterized simultaneously in accordance with homogenous characteristics. For sociological sciences it is of crucial importance to conjecture specific hypotheses focused on special sociological events or imagination. A development of sociological theory is one possible way to develop explanations concerning sociological events or objects. Therefore, positivism is often criticized as contrasted methodology applied for social inquiry. Social science requires development of special approaches focused on contingency, heterogeneity, path-dependence, and specialness corresponding to the plasticity of