How do you respond to Shakespeare’s presentation Essay

The theme of fathers and boys, and responsibilities and obligations primed(p) on sons, by fathers, is arguably one of the more important themes in the play. Shakespeare puts forward tierce main interpretations of father and son relationships, and each brings forbidden interesting viewpoints slightly responsibilities and obligations for the reader. The first father and son relationship that Shakespeare presents is that of hamlet and his father, mature Hamlet. In the encounter between Hamlet and the ghost of his father, Hamlet has the responsibility of avenge thrust upon him, and he rear endnot reject it, List, list, O, listIf thou didst ever thy love life father love If thou hast nature in thee, bear it not. Shakespeare presents gray-headed Hamlet as being pathetic and incapable of avenging himself. The ghost, thitherfore, does not agitate Hamlets initiative by instilling fear in him, only if rather through putting him in a guilt-trap, qualification Hamlet feel that he is somehow obliged to carry out the vengeful murder in place of his father, as the ghost dejectionnot ensue to it himself. In my opinion, this action, on the part of the ghost, was the final push that caused Hamlet to hail into his apparent madness. Hamlet was obviously moved by the ghosts words.And thy commandment all alone shall live Within the book and flashiness of my brain, Unmixed with baser matter. This was very largely unfair of the ghost of his father, on Hamlet, crazy though he seemed at first. It located an unnaturally large enumerate of pressure on Hamlet, having to commit such a daunting act, heretofore uprightified it may rush seemed. Shakespeare emphasizes the effect of this action in Hamlets life, in the many incidences and soliloquys where Hamlet just muses, thinks the situation out and talks about it, but can neer bring himself to actually do anything about the revenge.In the relationship of Laertes and Polonius, in that location is not so much responsi bility placed on Laertes by Polonius, as there is nagging and nitpicking about the direction that Laertes should present himself and the way he should live his life when he is overseas. In this sense, the responsibilities being placed on Laertes are those of maintaining in his fathers get out and rule, and maintaining a near(a) name for himself. At the point in the play, in act I. 3, Polonius is displayed by Shakespeare as just another normal father, or maybe more appropriately, a mother, who is proud of his son, but needs to inspire him to keep a good image all the same.This bestowing of responsibility can be considered to be only natural for any father to do. However, in act II. 1, we see that Polonius is actually quite obsessed with the idea that his son tycoon bring shame to Polonius, and goes to the extents of sending a spy keep a watch on Laertes, and even muddy his name, so that he does not get too comfortable. But breath his faults so quaintly that they may seem The ta ints of liberty, the flash and outbreak of a fiery sagaciousness I saw him enter a house of sale,Videlicet, a brothel, or so forth. Polonius even goes to extents of dishonouring so that he may defend his throw honour, which is a rather strange sense of logic. In this sense, it can be said that Polonius places responsibility on his son just to present himself any possible shame. This is rather selfish on the part of Polonius, but it is in accordance with Shakespeares illustration of Poloniuss character as being that of a conniving, scheming, slightly evil old man that you might feel sorry for.In the relationship of young Fortinbras and his foster-father, or father-figure, old Norway, we see, again, a normal attitude of a parent toward their child. When Fortinbrass plans for an antiaircraft gun on Claudiuss realm are found out by Norway, he immediately admonishes the impetuous firebrand of a youth and prevents him from doing so. When Fortinbras indicates that he doesnt actually w ant to go along with the attack, Norway forgives him and even allows him to dress to Denmark on peaceful terms. In this sense, old Norway is teaching Fortinbras the responsibility of idea clearly and not acting rashly or whimsically.On the whole, Shakespeare presents the responsibilities and obligations placed on the sons, by their fathers, in Hamlet, as ways for the fathers to get what they want. In the case of Hamlet and the ghost, it is for the ghosts want of revenge and umpire for a murder most foul, without much thought as to the effects of the deed, and even the contemplation of the deed, in the case of Hamlet, on him. In the case of Laertes and Polonius, it is a selfish and unwarranted want to save his own face from any shame that Laertes need not necessarily have caused in the first place.In the case of Norway and Fortinbras, it is the want to maintain good diplomatic relations and the prevention of unnecessary quarrels. In all cases pull up the diplomatic one, the fathe rs in question were rather selfish and self-centered in thinking of ways to get their sons to do their bidding. In the case of Norway and Fortinbras, it was make for diplomatic reasons, but it was still to save the bed-ridden Norways old skin. This gives a rather negative impression of father figures and what they tell their children to do.Possibly, Shakespeare chose to illustrate these aspects of forefather the way that he did because it was his own interpretation of responsibilities and obligations set down by fathers, maybe drawn from his own bad experiences with his own father during his younger days. Hamlet, as a play, could be then seen to be a Shakespearean self-help guide on How to know what is right to do as a father by knowing what is wrong to do as a father, and it could have been a lesson to all the bad fathers out there who use manipulate their sons as they would a mindless henchman.