Video games and children Essay Example for Free

Video games and clawren EssayWhen give-up the ghost in the digital age, its a fact. Children argon using more technology than ever and in many ways it makes life safer and easier for families. But when 40- 75% of children in middle school already incur cell phones, as well as 89% of children charter their own laptops, and 97% of children and young adults job video games and/or own a gaming system. With the prevalence of video games obvious many adults have started asking themselves how these games affect their children. Should I be worried that my child is cultivateing violent video games? How foresightful should I allow my child to play video games? These questions are ones parents who are raising children in the eon of technology should be asking, these are the questions that have prompted experts to conduct countless studies on the topic. So here it is the good, bad, and unattractive of video games effect on children. I will present instruction on the positive make of gaming the negative cause of gaming, and what experts barrack is healthy for a child.Violent shoot em up games or seemingly mindless racing games resembling Mario Kart or condemnation consuming apps like crazy Birds dont necessarily bring pleasant thoughts to many parents minds but believe it or non there are well-nigh positive set up from video games. Video games actually improve riddle solving and logic skills. Specifically, the popular app Angry Birds forces children and adults alike to promptlyly come up with creative solutions to problems. As for those violent video games parents begrudgingly by their children, well they tend to increase hand-eye coordination, fine motor skills, and spatial skills. wound games often require the virtual character to be running and shooting at the same time. In order to be successful the real life controller must keep track of the character, obstacles in the characters way, the targets position, and the speed at which they are pursu ing each other and if the gunfire is hitting the target. Processing this information indeed causes the controller to use hand-eye coordination skills as well as using their spatial ability to be successful.Some studies still suggest that experience with video games maybe a contributing factor as to why fighter pilots of today are more successful with the controls. too making a desist analysis of a situation and then being able to quickly make a finale gives your brain a real work out. According to researchers at the University of Rochester, led by Daphne Bavelier, who is a cognitive scientist, says that gaming simulating stressful events like those found in battle or action games is a procreation tool for real world situations.Her study suggests that play action video games prepares the brain to make quick decisions, Video games similar to virtual simulations that already exist could possibly be used to train soldiers and surgeons. in like manner according to the same study f rom the University of Rochester action games train the players brains to make decisions quickly with out losing accuracy. alike a study from the Appalachia Educational Laboratory revealed that children with Attention-Deficit Disorder who played the popular arcade game spring Dance Revolution improved their reading scores by helping them concentrate. directly that we have reviewed the positive effects of video games, it is time to look at how video games can negatively affect children. First from dependence blog. org video games can cause an increase in emotional and behavioral disorder symptoms. It cuts family interaction time in half and it reduces the about of REM or resting sleep you get. Also it can increase childrens violent tendencies. This is because in video games kids are rewarded for the violence, and the violence it committed repeatedly. This participation and reward system are tools that people use for learning behaviors.Also researchers from the University of Minnesot a found that game addicts or kids who frequently play video games are more argumentative with teachers, fight with their friends and score lower grades. Also though some studies like the one previously mentioned here say that video games can improve a childs concentration, this has been proven to lonesome(prenominal) help concentration in short bursts of times but a childs overall attentiveness can be harmed. Also a study from the field of study Institute for Media and the Family suggests that video games can be addictive for kids, and that video games increase their depression and anxiety levels.Also the University of Texas at Dallas notes that excessive video gaming can lead to eyestrain, carpal tunnel syndrome, and back issues. As well as desensitization which is where people no longer reply to a sensory to the thoughtfulness of fear or violence. Also according to science daily some people can react with seizures to excessive video games. Some people have died after marathon video game binges. Now that we have looked at the positive and negative effects of video games, we can look at what experts recommend for children in terms of how long they play video games and what games they play.It is suggested that parents monitor the video games kids play just like they monitor websites and television show. As well as abide to the two hours of screen time master from the American Academy of Pediatrics. Screen time in this case means any time worn-out(a) in front of a computer, television, or cell phone doing anything besides calling or texting. Also the Palo Alto Medical Foundation recommends withholding from installing video game equipment in childrens bedrooms. ultimately experts say to follow the warning labels on games.These warning labels go from EC meaning early puerility to T for teen M for mature and AO for adults only. Although these warnings are out there, no one is enforcing them. Any child or teenager can go into a place like Game Stop and demor alize any video game regardless of the warning. Many people are fighting to put restrictions on games, such as if a game has a mature label or adult only having to provide identification to purchase it. If we have restrictions on other dangerous substances then why not these?There is no denying that video games can have positive effects. In certain situations they can even be used as learning tools. But parents need to monitor the video games children are playing like they would monitor the television shows they are watching. But one question we need to ask ourselves as a society is, do the pros outweigh the cons or is it the other way around? The negative effects of video games are extreme, but now you now the positive the negative and what to do to make certain(p) you or your child is safe from the dangers of video games.

U.S Foreign Policy on Pakistan Essay Example for Free

U.S Foreign form _or_ system of government on Pakistan EssayThe get together States foreign polity on Pakistan has been the exit of many reviews and the disparate and often unambiguous viewpoints articulated by Journalists and others have painted a plan of a country facing gargantuan challenges and in desperate need of a coherent U. S. policy that will help to pull it from the brink of nuclear abyss. Pakistan is one of the most populous countries in the realness and shares border with Iran, Afghanistan, China and India.It is a nation of diverse culture and different ethnic groups. Pakistan was an Ally of the linked States in the 1980s the period during which the Soviets were waging contend in neighboring Afghanistan. Relationship soured when the Taliban, an Islamic terrorist group, g everywheren Pakistan during 1996 2001. However, the relationship between the two countries improved after the September, 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United State and Pakistan has now bugger off an ally in the fight against terrorists.The United States policy towards Pakistan cannot be viewed in isolation as Pakistan is seen as a vital country that can lend stability to a region fraught with war and ethnical disagreements. Pakistan has nuclear capabilities and there is a grave concern pertaining to nuclear proliferation The hope is that terrorists will not get their hands on nuclear material from that country. Terrorists associated with the Taliban have been using discussion sections of Pakistan as a base to launch terrorist attacks.Helene Cooper, writing in The New York Times on March 8, 2009, articulated that experts in the region feel that the United States may need to have conversations to leaders of the Taliban if it is serious about gaining public security and stability in Pakistan and surrounding countries. This is at odds with the stated policy of the Bush administration of not having dialogs with terrorists. Cooper cites a spic-and-span thrust by the new Obama administration to approach elements within the Taliban. United States Policy focus and changes are closely linked to concerns to not just about the Taliban, but in like manner concerns about Al Qaeda.Mark Mazzetti and David Rohde denomination in The New York times of June 30, 2008 posit the grave concerns regarding the Al Qaeda threat to Pakistan, the United States and other nations. Osama Bin Laden, the architect of the horrific attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, has been expanding his network in Pakistan and the journalists quoted intelligence sources detailing Osamas activities. The Journalists opined that there were serious missteps on the part of Washington and Islamabad concerning Policy agreements.The journalist also said that there was a secret US plan using Special Operation forces to launch missions into Pakistan to capture and kill the leaders of Al Qaeda. Carlotta cheeks article in the New York Times of March 11, 2009 provided further evide nce of a figure of speech shift in US policy towards Pakistan. Hardliners in the Taliban, such as Gulbuddin Hekmatyar is reported to have ho-hum his stance of demanding the exodus of all US troops from Pakistan and is now more willing to attend talks.American Officials are not commenting on negotiations with the Taliban however feedback from diplomats in Kabul shows that the United States has grown more undecided to negotiations. Helene Cooper and Sheryl Stolberg insightful article in the New York Times of March 7, 2009 also posit that the new Obama administrations shift in policy concerning Pakistan would also mean a willingness to engage insure elements of the Taliban. The US successfully engaged militant Sunni Militias in Iraq which led to a diminution in military force in that country.The Journalist feels that the new administration wants to adopt and translate this Policy to Pakistan. The US policy towards Pakistan has evolved over time and the journalistic views have pain ted a picture of dynamic and ever changing dialog. Steve Myers article in The New York times dated July 29, 2008 speaks of President George Bushs praise for Pakistans tendency to fight extremists along its borders and the allies seem to be working together again.Work CitedCooper, Helene and Sheryl Gay Stolberg.Obama Ponders Outreach bring in Elements of Taliban. New York Times. March 7, 2009 WK1. Cooper, Helene. Dreaming of splitting the Taliban. New York Times. March 8, 2009 WK1. Gall, Carlotta. As Us Weights Taliban Negotiations, Afghans are already talking. New York Times. March 11, 2009 A8. Myers, Steve L. Bush Praises Pakistan Just Hours After US Strike. New York Times. July 29, 2008 Mazzetti, Mark and David Rohde. Amid US Policy Disputes, Qaeda grows in Pakistan. New York Times. June 30, 2008.

Fast Food in HK Essay Example for Free

Fast Food in HK EssayFast diet, as you can witness is the term referring to feed that is prepargond and can be delivered in a lush time. It is traditionally American style repast that always included French fries, burgers and soft drinks. restaurants store precooked ingredients, once the customer gives an order, take-away can be ready in a while. To be called as Fast fodder, these viandss must meet a few standards good time management, quality stability and fixed price. It is a very normal meal style in some well- amplifyed cities, since the people have a entirely busy life. The first recorded fast food restaurant AW is founded in 1919 at the United States of America, and the arcminute one is the famous company White Castle in 1921. In this century, fast food restaurants develop and most of them become chains suppliers. US people spent billions on obtaining fast food every year. The fast food globalization had now become a huge social issue. nowadays there are over 5 00,000 fast food restaurants and thousands brands in the whole world. And today we are exit to focus on the two head quarters in Hong Kong McDonalds and KFC.Introduction of McDonalds McDonalds is definitely the biggest fast food chain in the world. It founded in 1940 by Richard and Maurice McDonald. Nowadays, over 33,000 McDonalds restaurants were naturalised in the worldwide. The products of McDonalds are in various types, mainly hamburgers, French fries, red jungle fowls and soft drinks. Sometimes, they will bid seasonal meal to attract customers such as Shake Shake French fries. spare-time activity differences of choices, McDonalds would also offer vegetarian food too.In order to fit the culture, they may change the meal a little bit for example not providing beef in India. You can always go up one on the street, be sire there are in total 200 stores in Hong Kong. McDonalds became popular all the time due to busy life schedule of Hong Kong people. Introduction of KFC On th e other hand, the Kentucky deep-fried Chicken (KFC) is the largest fried chicken shop in the world, and the second largest fast food chain afterward the McDonalds. Harland Sanders founded KFC in 1930 at Kentucky in the United States of America.KFC practically sells fried chicken pieces, coleslaw and drinks. The popularity of KFCs chicken comes from its original secret recipe which mixed with 11 herbs and spices. Not like the McDonalds, KFC has a smaller case with only 63 stores in Hong Kong. However, the numbers didnt affect the KFCs second largest place of fast food chain in Hong Kong. Advantages and disadvantages of Fast Food The biggest advantage of fast food is definitely FAST. people in modern societies are always in busy life schedule.Facing the hard workload, they may only have half an hour to have a meal and rush beck to their work. Thus, these quick overhaul restaurants help to solve to lack of time problem. Meals can be prepared within ten minutes. No matter how delici ous other food are, Hong Kong people have not enough time to buy ingredients, cook or enjoy. Second is the stability of food within one chain of fast food restaurant. Tastes are mainly the analogous in any store. You will never taste bad with the same meal. And the prices are predictable and affordable too.One fast food meal is always cheaper than you cook merely at home. However, fast food as called as junk food, affecting peoples health. Restaurant usually uses a lot of additives such as salt, flavorings and preservatives. The large amount of calories and additives are harmful to tender body. Since the fast food is all pre-cooked, the nutrients of the ingredients are lost. Therefore, some people may say that fast food is only for surviving. Eating fast food in a long term may cause various diseases such as diabetes and heart attack.Comparison of McDonalds and KFC In Hong Kong, McDonalds is obviously in a larger scale than KFC. Except the differences on the food kinds, the way t hey run the company are a bit different too. Apart from fast food restaurant, McDonalds have McCafes to provide desserts and coffee like Starbucks. Besides, McDonalds have works in different area of society such as charity, children health affair. But the KFC is just only a restaurant in Hong Kong. Therefore, people would called McDonalds as a better company than KFC in Hong Kong.

The Effect of World War and other World Events on the Development of Sport Essay Example for Free

The Effect of World fight and other World Events on the Development of Sport turn outWorld state of war 2 publicationed the development of lark about more dramatically than any former world dismantlet/war, simply beca workout it was a totally different war, civilians were in danger as salubrious as the soldiers, due to the late style of fighting. WW2 was a much more mobile war and then any other war as it was the first time when bombing was really introduced on a enlarged scale meaning that even if you were a civilian hundreds of miles a fashion from the brunt of the fighting you could still be attacked from the air. This meant that you could never play sport out in the unfastened in complete safety as bombing raids could come at any time civilians had other more pressing matters no their theme other than playing and developing sport.Also PE in cultivates was set back considerably due to umpteen PE teachers beingness enlisted into the army and many another(prenom inal) were used to train military personnel. Any PE that was taught in school was mainly based around individual initiative and survival instead than the concepts on sport.PE taught during the Second World War is very different to the conventional PE that we know now, although it had educative intentions, the practical side of it was predominantly physical training, rather than learning how to play particular sports. Four things mainly effected the changes that occurred in the inter-war syllabuses.The first bring being F.J.C Marshal and E. Major who published several books, they essentialed to increase the importance of skill learning and the use of apparatus (possibly to make practical PE lessons more like the army style of training, i.e. assault courses etc).The next influence was the publication of female physical educationists. Veronica Tyndale-Biscoe (1945) described modern dance as using the proboscis as a medium of expression. Similarly a gymnast Ruth Clark (1946) sugges ted that working on apparatus at his own value has particular value to the timid child, who gains courage through the discovery for himself of his own capabilities. So they also believed that apparatus should be used, but in such a way that children would learn round their sporting strengths and weaknesses themselves.The third influence was C.E. Cooke who extended F.J.C. Marshall and E. Majors views, by actually bringing new army apparatus into schools after seeing them in use by commandos in the Northern manipulate Physical Training School she believed the children would enjoy the skill and adventure provided by the apparatus. Even though she musical theme the children would enjoy the skill it was still mainly aimed at physical training rather than the skills of playing sport.The extend main influence of the inter-war syllabus was a woman named Miss Dudgeon, who was working at a children refilling clinic. PE had always been aimed at making children react to a set task. But she believed in setting open tasks where children could respond in their own time.So sport at a PE level was furbish uped importantly by the Second World War, but sports them selves were affected by the war as well. There was a 12- course of instruction gap between the 1938 World Cup in France and the 1950 World Cup in Brazil. The Olympics also had to be turned due to the Second World War as in July of 1939, just one year before the Games were to be held, The IOC awarded the Games to Helsinki, Finland. Helsinkis organizing committee prepared for the Games, but when Finland was attacked by the Soviet Union in November, they had to withdraw. The IOC ( internationalistic Olympic Committee), realizing the futility of trying to find a venue for the Olympics during what would come to be known as World War II, abandoned the idea of holding the Summer Games in 1940.The 1936 Olympics were also affected by the up and approach war as the games were manipulated by the Nazi government to promot e the countries political ideals. Many Germans were imprisoned so they couldnt disrupt the games. Only Germans of Hitlers so call Aryan race were allowed to compete for Germany. This had a huge affect on the game as other Germans were banned from taking part.Not only did the war effect sporting competitions that were going to happen, but also many sports players were enlisted into the army and died in battle, and therefore crippling many sports of their star players and teams.Other events have also affected sport in kinda a large way the most recent being the terrorist acts that happened on September 11th 2001. As a essence of this the 2001 Ryder Cup, which was due to be played at The Belfry in England was called off, and rescheduled with the same teams and players for September 2002, again at The Belfry. All Champions League and UEFA Cup games were postponed and the Davis Cup tie between USA and India was played 12-14 October instead of its pilot burner date. The tragedy of Sept ember 11th had a big affect on sport and the athletes competing just as all other past world events have.Foot and mouth was a distemper which hit England quite badly in terms of sport, as not only did it postpone professional sports but even more so amateur sports, for mannikin most Sunday football leagues were basically stopped because of the disease spreading so rapidly. The team I played for at the time had half of their season cancelled due to our home ground being next to a farm. Also all inter school competitions were cancelled due o the outbreak.Foot and mouth effected professional bowls when the British Isles International indoor series was postponed, and the World Indoor Championships were also postponed by foot and mouth.Nearly all sport fixtures in Ireland were postponed due to the outbreak of foot and mouth, in particular games during the 6 nations cup had to be postponed, for example international matches between England and Ireland were rescheduled.There have been ma ny events which have hindered the development of sport but it seems the societies want to play them and to play them in competition has kept sport alive, in such a way that governing bodies have been formed to increase the level at which we play. Even games like darts and fob which might be consider as pub games have become into professions for some people.ReferencesB Davis, R Bull, J Roscoe, D Roscoe 199 Pyhsical Education and Mosby the Study of SportForth Editionhttp//www.olympic.org/uk/index_uk.asphttp//news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/1207132.stmhttp//www.jenk1ns7.freeserve.co.uk/6nationsquotes.htm

Galileo Galilei Essay Example for Free

Galileo Galilei EssayGalileo Galilei is an Italian lotus-eater, physicist, philosopher, and mathematician. He ranks with Archimedes, Newton, and Einstein as one of the greatest scientists of all time. His discoveries, do with the crudest of equipment, were brilliant examples of scientific deduction. Galileos studies of natural laws laid the groundwork for the experimental scientists who followed him. Galileo was born at Pisa, the son of a musician who think a medical career for him. He began studying medicine at the University of Pisa. According to leg wind up, Galileo made his setoff major discovery at this time.He is said to have used his pulse to time the scintillation of a suspended lamp in a cathedral he found that, no matter how removed the lamp swung, the timing has always the same (Drake, 2002). In later life Galileo established the fact that a free-swinging object, or pendulum, moves in uniform time intervals. Pendulum clocks are a common application of this prin ciple. Thesis arguing This paper scrutinizes the life and contributions of Galileo Galilei. II. Discussion Galileo constructed the first telescope used for astronomical observations the observations he made support Copernicus surmisal that the cheer is the center of the solar system.In physics, Galileo discovered the principles of motion followed by swinging pendulums, locomote bodies, and flying projectiles. Galileo used his heartbeat to time the period of a pendulum. He realized that a pendulum could be used as a standard of time for a clock (Rose 2004). Pendulum clocks are smooth sold today, more than three hundred years after their invention. Moreover, changing from the study of medicine to that mathematics and natural science, Galileo conducted experiments on gravity that brought him to public attention.In 1589, he became a lecturer on mathematics at the University of Pisa, and began his studies of bechanceing bodies. According to legend, as mentioned earlier, he dropped objects from the Leaning Tower of Pisa to prove his theory that bodies fall at the same speed and with the same acceleration regardless of their weight and size. He also demonstrate that projectiles follow a parabolic path. These discoveries were contrary to the teachings of the ancient Greek scientist and philosopher Aristotle, many of whose ideas had for centuries been accepted without question.Galileo aroused such(prenominal) opposition that in 1951 he was forced to resign from the university (Rose 2004). The next year Galileo obtained a professorship in mathematics at the University of Padua, where he remained for 18 years. This was a period of successful research, acclaim, and prosperity for Galileo. In 1609, Galileo receive news of the invention, in Flanders, of a device that made a distant objects appear larger. He at once set out to build such a device for himself. The final result was a 32-power refracting telescope, with which he made series of major discoveries (Poupar d 2005).He found by observation that the moon shone only from reflected light that the Milky Way was formed of a multitude of stars and that the planet Jupiter was circled by several moons. His discoveries caused great ardor among astronomers he was besieged with orders for telescopes. In 1610, Galileo left Padua for Florence to become official mathematician and philosopher to Grand Duke Cosimo II de Medici. By the end of the year his telescopic discoveries included the rings of Saturn, the phases of Venus, and sun spots.His observations clearly confirmed the theory of the Polish astronomer Copernicus that the earth and planets revolved around the sun. The church, however, had accepted as conforming the Bible the earlier idea of the planets and sun revolving around the stationary earth. When Galileo visited Rome in 1611 he was given a welcome by church building officials befitting one of the greatest astronomers of all time, as he was then acknowledged to be. This gave him the cour age to proclaim his support of the Copernican theory of the solar system. Controversy flared.Although warned by the Church to avoid religious adaptation of his theory, Galileo attempted to prove it by quoting the Bible. He was told by the Church in 1616 to abandon the Copernican theory because it contradicted the Bible. In 1632, however, he published conference on the Two Chief Systems of the World, in which he bring to his argument in favor of the Copernican system. Galileo was then summoned to appear before the Inquisition and forced to part with the view that the earth moves around the sun (Poupard, 2005). Although sentenced to imprisonment, he was permitted to retire to his home, where he continued his studies.III. Conclusion As a conclusion, Galileo Galilei made great contributions to our society through his invention and discoveries. His works are highly acclaimed and made significant impact in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, and in sciences. Reference Drak e, Stillman (2003). Cause, Experiment, and Science a Galilean Dialogue (University of Chicago) Poupard, Paul (2005. Galileo at work Toward a Resolution of 350 Years of Debate, 1633-1983 (Duquesne University). Rose, Sidney (2004). Galileo and the Magic Numbers (Little, Brown).

Close Relationships Essay Example for Free

Close Relationships EssayI never have been a very(prenominal) good communicator, be it family, friends or strangers. After reading the name Close Relationships Some sequences Mask Poor Communication it really hit home for me. My husband and I have poor communication skills. We have been together for the past six years, and we still have a problem commutating. He likes to take over the conversation, or cut me off when we be talking. I aroma at times that he is talking at , not to me, or he is making me incur like I dont have a clue on what it going on. He has at times actually told me that I just dont know as oftentimes as he does, therefore his ideas and suggestions should be followed, and not questioned. This has honestly ca physical exertiond a huge amount of arguments and ageless disagreements. My lifestyle is so busy I communicate and think very quickly and a fate of the time I guess I expect people to know what I mean without amply explaining it. In my observation o ver time, people seem to communicate better with strangers than they do with family members.I pure tone that when communicating with strangers one tends to give more detail, because you never know how a stranger will show what you are sweating to communicate. People commonly rely that they communicate better with close friends than with strangers. That closeness stick out lead people to overestimate how well they communicate, a phenomenon we term the closeness-communication bias, (Keysar, 2011) I found this sentence very interesting. A wife who says to her husband, its getting hot in here, as a hint for her husband to twisting up the air conditioning a notch, may be surprised when he interprets her statement as a coy, amorous advance instead, (Savitsky 2011).It has plump very clear to me that even though I may communicate something to my husband, at times when he doesnt seem to understand, I get frustrated, I propose to try a lot of the communication tools I have learned in this class to try and help clean up my communications with my friends, family and co-workers. Our problem in communicating with riends and spouses is that we have an illusion of insight. acquiring close to someone appears to create the illusion of understanding more than actual understanding, (Epley, 2011).I actually had this stake retrieve to me last weekend. My husband and I were working in the yard, he was fixing a sprinkler wire, and I was replacing sprinkler heads and drip lines. We were both doing our own things while still working in the yard. I public opinion everything was going great, then out of now where, my husband says, that I dont appreciate the political campaign he is moldting into helping Me in the yard.I was completely blown away. I said in a defensive tone, that I didnt know I had to tell him thank you every time he does stuff rough the house. I went on to say that it is his house to, so why do I constantly have to thank him, or ask him to do things to he lp out around the house. I know that I could have handled this situation differently however it really gets tiresome to always have to tell him I appreciate every single little task that he completes. I had another situation among my husband and myself over the weekend.I was talking with him about hanging up our Ameri asshole flag, I asked him if he knew where my curtain rod went, I explained to him the one I was appearing for, he finds this small rod and says that he wanted to use that one, I told him I already had plans for that rod, and the one I was looking for was perfect. He continued to take the rod that I did not want to use and put the flag on it, and they tried to hang it up. He kept telling me to just come and look at it. So after telling him for the 7th time that I didnt want to use that rod, I went to look at it.It was too small and would not hang correctly, I told him that again, and he got vexed off at me, and told me to never ask him to help me do anything ever ag ain I was idiotic that he wouldnt listen to me it is always his way or no way. When this happens, it is very easy to become angry with my spouse because we expected them to understand what we meant or said, to listen and try to understand. As couples, we want to believe that we are on the same page all the time because we are so close.Whether we are vista to face, back to back, in another room, or on the phone with each other, misunderstandings can and will happen without further questioning from the other spouse. When something is said, it is the other spouses responsibility to make sure they are clear in what they are hearing. Without this tactic, there will be misinterpretations between the spouses. This creates unhealthy communication between the spouses. My spouse it not a good family man, he prefers to do what he wants, when he want too. This tends to be a huge problem for our relationship.When my spouse gets mad at me for not listening to him, he starts making threats, like I mentioned earlier, dont ever ask him to help again, etc So, I stop including him in those things, then he starts going through all kinds of changes because of it. He would say, I support you in anything you do. then he would vent like crazy about our life not being the same anymore. Your self-image, in turn, results in your level of self-esteem, the beliefs and feelings you have about yourself. Self-esteem has two primary components a sense of self-efficacy or your personal effectiveness and a sense of your personal worth and self-respect.However, your self-concept, self-image, and self-esteem are not destiny. You can also enhance your self-esteem through affirmations and positive self-talk, (Sole, 2011). You can build your self-image and your self-esteem by prospering experiences. Your successes create self-confidence, which enables you to take on new challenges and continue to increase your self-esteem in an upward hand-build of success. It is critical that one learns to com municate accurately it will help all your relationships become stronger and be successful.

Motorcycle Helmet law debate Essay Example for Free

pedal Helmet justness debate EssayAcross the United States, every year billions of license drivers deal to ride bicycles or else than drive automobiles for a variety of reasons Reasons range from individual pleasure to a much more ad fit effective way to get off. The linguistic world(a) motorcycle helmet law debate over the past forty languish time has revolved around whether the national presidency should adopt a prevalent helmet law that rules every(prenominal) motorcyclists to get out helmets at all times when move to reduce societies economic appeal, or whether the individual rider should brook the right to choose quite a to wear or non wear a helmet. In 1967, near all States implemented a mandatory cosmopolitan helmet law in order to grow federal property to repair and improve our Interstate Highways. Once the 1966 topic Highway Safety comprise was imposed, the floor of motorcycle helmet legislation began. Americans hold continuously debated ove r the balance between an individuals rights, the vanquish interest of the public and when the government should take measures to protect the people of the United States from harm.Four out of volt Americans atomic number 18 in go of a widely distributed helmet law, yet motorcyclists represent only somewhat deuce per centum of all registered vehicles in the United States ( home(a) Highway occupation Safety brass instrument 2008). This suggest that a majority of supporters are every non motorcycle owners and/or seemed to nourish taken a utilitarianism cost and benefits analysis approach, which according to Michael Sandel many contest, that a weakness in utilitarianism is that it fails to respect individual rights. Supporters believe that tiring a motorcycle helmet protects riders by preventing heartrending head injuries and glares mortality rates, which results in night club saving an enormous deal of economic cost, such(prenominal)(prenominal) as taxes, insurance prem iums and government funded healthcare expenses. Non-supporters, including myself a registered motorcycle owner, argue that a common helmet law is unconstitutional, as it deflowers our right to Freedom of Choice as written in our Bill of Rights.Despite the tremendous amount of statistics, that claim motorcycle helmets may reduce head injuries and lower fatalities, as of now only twenty dollar bill States and the District of Columbia currently have and enforce a universal motorcycle helmet law, twenty-seven States that do enforce partial motorcycle helmet laws that are directed at riders under a certain age (usually 18) and three States (Illinois, Iowa, and New Hampshire) still currently have no helmet laws in role (National Highway Traffic Safety system 2008).In order to have a better understanding of the ratiocination of the universal motorcycle helmet law, you have to know the history of the legislation of the universal motorcycle helmet law. The beginning of motorcycle helme t legislation in the United States was when the 1966 National Highway Safety Act was originally gived to generate additional federal funding to States for our Interstate Highway System.However, in order for the States to receive funding, the federal government placed stipulations that influenced States to comply with golosh laws that the federal government wanted to be in place. If the States did not comply, they would lose these funds (see Note a, b, c, d and e in Figure 1, Homer, Jenny and French, Michael 416. ) front to 1966, only three States (New York, Massach drug abusetts, and Michigan) had motorcycle helmet use laws, even though motorcycle helmet usage began as aboriginal the 1920s by Motorcycle racers as a form of protection (Jones, Marian Moser, and Ronald Bayer 209).By 1967, afterward the federal standard for State Highway Safety Programs was implemented requiring States to have a universal motorcycle helmet law in effect in order to qualify for additional federal fu nds All but three States (California, New Hampshire and Illinois) complied by implementing and enforcing a universal helmet law that required all motorcycle riders to wear helmets, so they would qualify to receive the additional Interstate Highway funding. Then, By 1975, 47 states and the District of Columbia had adopted universal helmet laws.This trend reversed dramatically in the latter half(prenominal) of 1975 when Congress acquiesced to the pressure exerted by groups such as ABATE, and amended the Act to remove the contingency of federal highway funds on universal helmet laws. The amendment take to the repeal of universal coverage in 27 states shortly thereafter (Derrick, Allison J. , and Lee D. Faucher 229). Between 1989 and 1994, Congress once again began to try and influence the States to ordinance a universal motorcycle helmet law by implementing the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, to a fault known as ISTEA.ISTEA provided special incentive impar ts to states with both universal motorcycle helmet laws and passenger vehicle condom belt use laws. A state qualified for a first-year grant by having these devil laws in effect. In subsequent eld, the state also was required to exceed minimum motorcycle helmet and safety belt use levels (helmet use of 75 percent in the second year and 85 percent in the third year). Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia received grants for one or more of the fiscal years 1992, 1993, and 1994 for which the grants were authorized (R. G. Ulmer and D.F. Preusser 5).The ISTEA Act was much more effect on the universal safety belt law rather than the universal helmet laws States were more successful in implementing and convincing Americans to comply with safety piazza belt laws rather than a universal motorcycle helmet law. I agree with Charles Umbenhauer of USA Today who believes different seat belts, helmets represent a separate purchase. Helmet laws, on the other hand, are a manifestati on of societys teaching that its members lack the wisdom to bushel decisions about personal safety and must therefore be subjected to despotic laws. Between 1995 and 2001, Congress implemented the National Highway System Designation Act. This Act repealed the ISTEA largely in solvent to taping by the tutord and very organized motorcycle groups, such as American Motorcycle Association AMA, Motorcycle Riders Foundation, and American Bikers Aimed Toward Education ABATE. The lobbying of these groups resulted in five States (Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana and Texas) repealing their universal helmet requirements.According to the Congressional Record- Senate on June 20, 1995 that after very much debate over mandating a universal motorcycle helmet law, US Congress decided that States would be required to implement motorcycle rider cultivation programs instead of a universal helmet law to receive funding. Congress acted in accordance to Aristotle belief that Legislators make t he citizens good by forming habits in them, and this is the wish of every legislator, and those who do not effect it miss their mark, and it is this that a good constitution differs from a bad one (Sandel, Michael 198).Of the current thirty States that allow adult riders to choose rather they prefer to wear helmets or not, three States require the rider must be 18 years or older Five States require the rider must be 21 years or older The remaining nineteen States have other stipulations that require riders to either complete motorcycle training courses, have a helmet in possession, but not required to wear the helmet and/or a minimum of $10,000. 00 of medical insurance that is specifically for injuries resulting from motorcycle crashes (National Highway Traffic Safety administration 2008).In November 2010, supporters led by safety groups and the insurance industry began to lobby that all States that currently do not have and/or enforce a universal motorcycle helmet law should imple ment a universal motorcycle helmet law Aristotle would have most likely supported this act, as he stated The single-valued function of politics is nothing less than to enable people to develop their distinctive human capacities and virtuesto deliberate about the common good, to acquire practical judgment, to share in self-government, to care for the fate of the community as a whole (Sandel, Michael 194).While on the other hand, universal helmet law opponents like Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner that stated It is the chew over of Congress to defend the license and individual responsibilities that motorcycle riders across the nation enjoy as they travel the open roads of America, and Mr. Stricklands plan greatly concerns me as it is not the job of the federal government to fix one-size- fits-all helmet laws. Mr.Strickland appears to be intent on pursuing all means possible to enact mandatory helmet laws either at the federal level or by violating the principles of the 10th Amendment and bullying the States into enacting mandatory helmet laws. Motorcyclists under the lead of very organized motorcycle groups in the United States, since 1967 have continued to lobbying for repeal in the twenty States that currently have a universal helmet law. nigh Americans agree there is a need to create laws that set limits and regulations in order to have a civilized society However, motorcyclist believe this can be done without the government violating our individual Freedom of Choice, which allows a person to decide to take risks as long as they are only risking their own person and their property. According to libertarian theory of rights, Even if riding a motorcycle without a helmet is reckless, and even if helmet laws save lives and prevent devastating injuries, libertarians argue that such laws violate the rights of an individual to decide what risks to assume.As long as no third parties are harmed, and as long as motorcycle riders are responsible for their own medical bills, the state has no rights to dictate what risks they may take with their bodies and lives (Sandel, Michael 60). Despite the overwhelming evidence, some motorcyclists (including myself) refuse to wear helmets all the time when riding and discriminate universal helmet laws because universal helmet laws represent government interference and these laws impede an individuals Freedom of Choice. Most Americans would agree that wearing a motorcycle helmet is probably one of the safest pieces of protective outerwear when riding a motorcycle, but opponents of a universal helmet law, are disagreeing with the idea that the government should not mandate laws that take away(p)(predicate) an individuals right to choose what to wear ground on the Ninth Amendment The Ninth Amendment to the US Constitution says no law shall be enacted that regulates the individuals freedom to choose his personal actions and mode of dress so long as it does not in any way affect the life, liberty, and happin ess of others.We are being forced to wear a particular type of apparel because we choose to ride motorcycles (Jones, Marian Moser, and Ronald Bayer 212). The United States Constitution is the foundation for the laws written in the United States. Our founding fathers created the constitution to contribute a government for the people of the United States of America, but it does not grant you individual rights. The Bill of Rights was created to grant and protector your individual rights by limiting powers of government.A universal helmet law is an act of means ends paternalism based on Immanuel Kants distinction made between hypothetical and categorical imperatives. Means-ends paternalism mirrors a hypothetical imperative, because it fundamentally takes the form of requiring people to do things that will lead to the satisfaction of their own goals. States Legislatures have passed a universal motorcycle helmet law in the past and justified by claiming it would prevent people from exp osure of serious head reproach, which would cause financial and emotional harm to others, not just to the riders.Those who continue to support and lobby for a universal helmet law, make the claim that helmets are effective in reducing head injuries, which society bears the be of non-helmet riders injuries, thereby establishing a public interest. By requiring the rider to use reasonable safety equipment, such as a motorcycle helmet, it prevents harm to others, not just to the motorcyclist. If the motorcyclist chooses not to wear a helmet, they may increase the risk that when an accident occurs, it could possible result in more severe injuries.The riders is guarantee government funded medical assistant under the United States Constitution, so the costs of those accidents will become a file not only on the riders, but also on taxpayers, because not all riders have adapted insurance or savings to pay for all of their medical expenses. According to John Stuart Mill, subject to punct uate duties of justice and fair contribution, state coercion is justified only to prevent or punish acts cause harms to other persons, not harms to self.Harm to others can be found in almost any type of behavior indirect harm is subject to limitless expansion. Those who support apparently paternalistic policies identify apparent(prenominal) harms to others, such as financial burdens associated with risky behaviors. Examples of this type of behavior would be the costs of emergency response and health care for injuries that could have possibility been prevented by wearing a motorcycle helmet. According to NHTSA stem to Congress regarding the Benefits of Safety Belts and Motorcycle Helmets society would be able to save cost by mandating a universal helmet law.An analysis of linked data from CODES with universal helmet laws showed that without the helmet law, the total extra inpatient charges due to mindset injury would have almost doubled from $2,325,000 to $4,095,000 A number of studies have compared hospital costs for equipped and un-helmeted motorcyclists involved in traffic crashes. These studies have revealed that un-helmeted riders involved in crashes are less likely to have insurance and more likely to have higher hospital costs than helmeted riders involved in similar crashes Estimates that motorcycle helmet use save $1.3 billion in 2002 alone and an additional $853 million would have been saved if all motorcyclists involved in fatal crashes had worn helmets Estimates that motorcycle helmet use saved $19. 5 billion in economic costs from 1984 through 2002 and an additional $14. 8 billion would have been saved if all motorcyclists had worn helmets during the same period CODES study also found that brain injury cases were more than twice as costly as non-brain injury cases for the one-year period studied. Among the un-helmeted motorcycle inpatients, charges for those throe brain injuries were 2.25 times higher than for those without brain injuries. Long-term costs were not included. (See EXHIBIT 13 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1996). Both sides of the debate present strong arguments that support their reasonings regarding a universal motorcycle helmet law. Supporters of a Universal motorcycle helmet law continually argue that, a universal helmet law would save not only health care costs it would in addition also lower taxes, insurance rates and save lives according to NHTSAs reports.Meanwhile, those who couple a universal motorcycle helmet law believe Despite the strong evidence implicating repeal of helmet use laws as the cause of the large recent increases in fatally injured motorcyclists, the American Motorcyclist Association claimed that after an examination of available current data on motorcycle accidents, fatalities, registration and licensure, in addition to such relevant topics as weather conditions, we find that the NHTSA was altogether premature in its judgment .. . in faulting the general repeal of helmet use laws. The Motorcycle Safety Foundation has also recently suggested that the NHTSA has selected information supporting helmet use laws and disregarded information to the contrary (Watson, Geoffrey S. , Paul L. Zador, and Alan Wilks 580). NHTSA, the insurance industry, and motorcyclist groups use FARS and GES Auxiliary Datasets, which are one-to-one mappings of the Accident, Vehicle, and mortal files.When conducting research you have the ability to analyze the data in either its full detail as coded or only the data you want to, it depends on the safety issue that is being questioned and the results that you which to obtain, which can led to biases results. By passing a universal motorcycle helmet law, the Federal Government is suggesting that the average adult motorcyclist does not have enough common sense to make their own woofs, therefore they are required to mandate or should I say dictate proper behavior for a motorcyclist.The best solution is to educate both mo torcyclist and automobile drivers through safety training that will help prevent motorcycle accidents, rather than mandating a universal motorcycle helmet law that only violates the rights of the motorcyclist right to choice or not to choice to wear a helmet. It is the history of motorcycle legislation debate that demonstrates to me, American motorcyclist have placed a value on their Freedom of Choice and have been successful over the past four decades communication that they value their Freedom of Choice to the government For that I am thankful.Motorcyclists in general, enjoy the sense of freedom that we associate with riding and by passing a universal motorcycle helmet law it would strip away that sensation from us. As, when I am riding a motorcycle without a helmet my senses come alive, that includes my sense of freedom It is the power of the sun warming my skin, the touch of the cooling breeze across my face, the aroma of the salty marine air or the giant redwoods, the sound o f thunder roaring beneath me, which allows me to have the sense of loyal freely.Works Cited Derrick, Allison J. , and Lee D.Faucher. Motorcycle helmets and rider safety A legislative crisis. ledger of reality health Policy 30. 2 (2009) 226-242. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 23 Oct. 2011 Homer, Jenny, and Michael French. Motorcycle Helmet Laws in the United States from 1990 to 2005 Politics and Public wellness. American Journal of Public Health 99. 3 (2009) 415-423. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 12, Oct. 2011. Hope Gilbert, Neil Chaudhary, Mark Solomon, David Preusser, Linda Cosgrove, military rank of the reinstatement of the helmet law in Louisiana, DOT HS 810 956.Washington DC National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (May 2008) Web 22, Oct. 2011, www. NHTSA. dot. gov. Houston, David J. , and Lilliard E. Richardson Jr. Motorcycle Safety and the cabbage of Universal Helmet Laws. American Journal of Public Health 97. 11 (2007) 2063-2069. Business Source Pre mier. EBSCO. Web. 12 Oct. 2011. Jones, Marian Moser, and Ronald Bayer. Paternalism Its Discontents. American Journal of Public Health 97. 2 (2007) 208-217. Academic Search Premier.EBSCO. Web. 20 Oct. 2011. Jim Sensenbrenner Representative. Sensenbrenner introduces resolution to defend the rights of motorcycle riders. FDCH Press Releases (n. d. ) Military Government Collection. EBSCO. Web. 20 Oct. 2011. Sullum, Jacob. Freedom Riders. Reason 37. 6 (2005) 40. MasterFILE Premier. EBSCO. Web. 01 Oct. 2011. Charles C. , Umbenhauer. Its our right to decide. USA Today n. d. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 01 Oct. 2011. R. G. Ulmer and D. F. Preusser.Evaluation of the Repeal of Motorcycle Helmet Laws in Kentucky and Louisiana, DOT HS 809 530 Washington DC National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (October 2003) Web 12, Oct. 2011, www. NHTSA. dot. gov. Sandel, Michael. Justice Whats the Right Thing to do? New York, Farrar, Straus, and Groux, 2009. United States Department of Transportation. National Health Traffic Safety. Report to Congress Benefits of Safety Belts and Motorcycle Helmets DOT HS 808 347, Washington DC National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (February 1996) Web 2, Oct.2011, www. NHTSA. dot. gov. United States Department of Transportation. National Health Traffic Safety. Traffic Safety Facts DOT HS 810 887W, Washington DC National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (January 2008) Web 12, Oct. 2011, www. NHTSA. dot. gov. Watson, Geoffrey S. , Paul L. Zador, and Alan Wilks. The Repeal of Helmet Use Laws and Increased Motorcyclist Mortality In the United States, 1975-1978. American Journal of Public Health 70. 6 (1980) 579. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 4 Oct. 2011.